Skip to content
integrated computational thinking

LA Pathway C: Composing Interactive Computationally Enhanced Texts (Overview)

< Back to Building Block
Step 5 of 5: Evaluate and compare computational tools

Practice C4 asks students to evaluate and compare (if using more than one programming tool) computational tools in order to determine how these tools may have changed their understanding of and ability to create different forms of interactive compositions (i.e., argumentative, descriptive, narrative, expository).

Practice in Action

Student conversations and reflections during or after they've created computationally enhanced texts can consider questions such as:

How did the computational tool (e.g., Scratch) strengthen the writing of expository texts? If we were to have written this composition on pen and paper (word processor document) what would have been lost? What was gained from making your composition interactive (allowing a reader to click or openly explore a project)?

When might you use Scratch and when might you use Twine? What are the pros and cons of each?