Skip to content
integrated computational thinking
Step 4 of 4: Try the Simulation on Your Own

To try this simulation out, click on setup and then go.

purple arrows pointing to the setup and go buttons on simulator

Notice what happens. How do the patterns change?

a percentage vs time graph with one data point labeled as "percent: 18,72.6"

Try answering the following questions:

  • How many “turns” does it take before the patterns have changed and all citizens are “happy.” (You can hover over the graph to see the number of turns, X, and the % of happy citizens, Y).
  • What is the percentage of similar neighbors when everyone is “happy”?
  • Why do you think this percentage is different from the percentage the simulation is set at (30%)?

Now try playing around with the sliders a bit.

%-similar-wanted slider at 10%

Change the desired percentage by adjusting the slider for %-similar-wanted either up or down. How did the patterns change with this new value? How did the number of turns change? What about the percentage of similar neighbors once everyone is “happy”?

Also try interacting with the slider for population density. What effect does changing the population density have on the emerging patterns, and percentage of “happy” neighbors? What is not included in this simulation? What elements would you add to make this simulator more historically accurate?

Reflection

Reflect on what you've done in this project and answer the following questions:

How did the fact that this simulation focused on just one factor at a time help you understand housing segregation differently? What is useful about being able to focus on one factor and manipulate that factor in isolation?

What danger(s) could come from focusing on one factor while leaving out other factors that relate to housing segregation? Could these dangers negatively impact policies with good intentions aimed to curb this issue?