Skip to content
integrated computational thinking
Step 4 of 4: Critically engage with models and representations of social issues

The A3 practice of critically engaging with models and representations of social issues can be divided into two discreet practices focusing on how to:

  1. Determine what questions a model or representation related to social, historical, political, economic, or geographic phenomena (e.g. maps, timelines, visualizations, simulations, conceptual models) may or may not be able to answer.
  2. Assess the perspective and potential biases present in models or representations of social, historical, political, economic, or geographic phenomena to understand the viewpoint of their creators.

Practice in Action

A3.1 An activity that asks students to analyze the root cause of geopolitical conflicts can help in comparing and contrasting conflicts throughout history and in the present. For example, students can create a flowchart with questions about the nature of a historical conflict in order to categorize and compare conflicts. These questions can focus on political motivation, important events leading up to the start, sources of conflict stemming from race/religion, and other factors. After creating this flowchart, students can use their work to compare and contrast other conflicts including modern-day conflicts.

A3.2 In the classroom, students can be asked to compare and contrast different community or country maps, focused on the same region, to make claims about what perspectives are foregrounded or backgrounded in these maps.